Ancient History Encyclopedia has a new name!

We are now World History Encyclopedia to better reflect the breadth of our non-profit organization's mission. If you have bookmarks or links to our site on your blog or website, please update them. Learn More

The Roman bridge-builder: some aspects of his work


Jan van der Crabben
by N. A. F. Smith
published on 05 March 2012
Send to Google Classroom:

To judge from the literature on Roman engineering, there was a time when the history of bridge building was a prominent theme closely associated with a parallel and equally well-developed interest in Roman roads. Recently, as a result of a variety of new approaches to archaeological, technical and social themes, the emphasis has moved to aspects of hydraulic engineering and, in particular, problems of water power and water supply. Of course, fashions in engineering history, Roman or later, are bound to change from time to time. That is understandable and nothing new. On the other hand, any overall view of Roman civil engineering needs to integrate the various approaches, especially in so far as they affect one another. Bridge building, after all, is bridge building, whether the structures are for roads or aqueducts and, in this lecture, both functions will be considered.

However, before turning to engineering historical matters, it is important to notice, even briefly, a few points about method that are fundamental to comprehending the ancient past and especially its engineering. It is noticeable how frequently engineers who write history are disposed to imagine that any failure to comprehend early engineering is essentially a failure of modem intelligence. Too rarely is it realised that the real problem is a failure of the ancient evidence to reach the minimum level that comprehension and conclusions require. Nor, contrary to a number of recent exercises, is it a foregone conclusion that resort to modem analytical devices and computation is a means of making good gaps and faults in the evidence or illuminating problems of interpretation. What is more, and what is often worse, is that retrospective analysis of all manner of ancient technologies – machines, ships or metallurgical processes, never mind structures -can often become a debate about the validity of analytical methods p e r se and the historical issues are lost sight of. When it comes to trying to comprehend the Roman engineer's thoughts and ideas about design and construction, one must never forget that the evidence from the structures themselves is no substitute for the written word – and that commodity is always rare and frequently ambiguous.

Remove Ads


The Structural Engineer, Volume 71 No 914 (1993)

Editorial Review This article has been reviewed for accuracy, reliability and adherence to academic standards prior to publication.

Written by N. A. F. Smith, linked by Jan van der Crabben, published 05 March 2012. Source URL:

Disclaimer: World History Encyclopedia claims no authorship, intellectual property, or copyright on the material below. It is used solely for non-profit educational purposes, and none of the data is stored on our servers. If you want this content to be removed from the site, please contact us.

Remove Ads



We want people all over the world to learn about history. Help us and translate this article into another language!

Support Our
Non-Profit Organization

World History Encyclopedia is a non-profit organization. For only $5 per month you can become a member and support our mission to engage people with cultural heritage and to improve history education worldwide.

Become a Member  

Recommended Books


Cite This Work

APA Style

Smith, N. A. F. (2012, March 05). The Roman bridge-builder: some aspects of his work. World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from

Chicago Style

Smith, N. A. F.. "The Roman bridge-builder: some aspects of his work." World History Encyclopedia. Last modified March 05, 2012.

MLA Style

Smith, N. A. F.. "The Roman bridge-builder: some aspects of his work." World History Encyclopedia. World History Encyclopedia, 05 Mar 2012. Web. 10 May 2021.