Kindle Price: | $10.99 |
Sold by: | Simon and Schuster Digital Sales LLC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
Buried: An alternative history of the first millennium in Britain Kindle Edition
‘Tender, fascinating … Lucid and illuminating’ Robert Macfarlane
Funerary rituals show us what people thought about mortality; how they felt about loss; what they believed came next. From Roman cremations and graveside feasts, to deviant burials with heads rearranged, from richly furnished Anglo Saxon graves to the first Christian burial grounds in Wales, Buried provides an alternative history of the first millennium in Britain. As she did with her pre-history of Britain in Ancestors, Professor Alice Roberts combines archaeological finds with cutting-edge DNA research and written history to shed fresh light on how people lived: by examining the stories of the dead.
PRE-ORDER CRYPT, THE FINAL BOOK IN ALICE ROBERTS' BRILLIANT TRILOGY – OUT FEBRUARY 2024.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSimon & Schuster UK
- Publication dateMay 26, 2022
- File size62795 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
‘Roberts’s legions of fans will find themselves delighted by a book that is both accessible and expert, wears deep learning lightly, and provides a solid introduction to an often murky age in Britain’s early medieval past.’ — Daily Telegraph
‘Intriguing and informative [….] Fascinating’ — Country Life
Product details
- ASIN : B09DZ1CHLF
- Publisher : Simon & Schuster UK (May 26, 2022)
- Publication date : May 26, 2022
- Language : English
- File size : 62795 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 351 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #700,505 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #294 in Archaeology (Kindle Store)
- #1,533 in Archaeology (Books)
- #8,179 in Politics & Social Sciences (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Roberts repetitive weakness (IMHO) is extrapolating a Roman/Dark Age/Medieval cultural interpretation from burial and anatomical evidence by applying a 21st-century Humanist worldview. The problematic histories of Bede and others seldom reflect the mind's eye of the temporal inhabitants. However, Beowulf in its OE context influences Dark Age and Medieval OE/ME context, as did Geoffrey of Monmouth, Chaucer, Dante, Boccaccio, and the far more extant fragments of village-oriented poetry/storytelling. A modern, self-described Humanist, Roberts is out of context, attempting to impute humanism to an age before the invention.
In an early example, she questions the interpretation regarding why 1/3 of the heads of the dead are cut off. Sounds shocking. But, it isn't. In the context of the period, the headless corpse is an Occam's Razor from the era's worldview. Ghosts and spirits were not a matter of opinion. Ghosts and haunting spirits were expert facts. The Bible tells of the supernatural. The authorities of kings and religion agreed. To not agree, was heresy.
The dead likely agreed in life and likely participated in the village decapitation burial ritual. Removing dead heads, as frequently as it is observed, is easily understood as a community service to the departed to ensure they don't return, as they surely were seen to do, to haunt family and village. Did disemboweled Egyptian mummies represent anything different? Headless burial meant no ghosts. Gutless mummies represent a trip to Duat sans haunting spirits. Is it a wonder that the buried might later be dug up, staked, bricked, or cremated years later as the period literature describes?
Medieval literature in all surviving texts presents a belief in an extracorporeal human spirit and afterlife within both the Christian and Pagan traditions. There is no evidence from the period of a humanist worldview. Roberts suggests a Hellenistic philosophical tradition using Epicureans to deduce a classical knowledge transference into North Sea paganism, Britonic paganism allowed by Romans (not so much the Druids themselves), and later Roman Xtianity. Several of the graveyards she investigates began as a cult of dead saints. People wanted to draw near the saints in death and were buried in proximity for medieval-minded reasons.
The first historical evidence suggesting a non-haunted British world is expressed in the mid-16th century as Enlightenment began to question the supernatural and evil spirits.
The study of language, runes to Old English, and the body of poetic literature from the era reflect a human thought paradigm utterly foreign to 19-20th century. These are the graves of people holding a worldview we might likely never comprehend.
I was reminded in several passages of 'reading list' supplement. My list would include the academic work of CS Lewis in 'The Discarded Image'. Hana Videen's "The Wordhord: Daily Life in Old English" for a sense of word images and 'The Edge of the World: A Cultural History of the North Sea and the Transformation of Europe' by Michael Pye to consider a 10,000-year trading lingua franca.
In one chapter she (without any strong evidence) seemed to have wanted to "will" a set of crumbling remains into being a female warrior, even though admitting the they had eroded so badly that they crumbled upon being excavated. Later she brings up Brexit....why?
Finally in the Postscript she, after spending pages and pages talking about Anglo Saxons, talks dismissively about the term Anglo Saxons even continuing to being used (even while admitting to it being an ancient term) because of course, you guessed it ...modern white supremacy...and....you know, because languages and words change. The book was enjoyably chugging along fairly well, with a couple blips of her personal politics and a barely hidden distain of religion, and then that let down at the very end in the Postscript.
I was going to buy the Professors book "Ancestors". But after reading in the reviews that needlessly bringing up modern social, political, and religious dogma is even far more prevalent, I'll probably pass on it.
I buy a lot of books on forensics, human genomes, DNA, deep ancestry, and archaeology, that's what I want to read. Not an authors modern social and political opinions or dogmas, but science...not the authors "truth".
All that being said, I gave it a 4 star. (Note: I'm not, British, nor religious, my opinions are based on the book)