Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The Fate of the Apostles 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-101138549134
- ISBN-13978-1138549135
- Edition1st
- Publication dateFebruary 5, 2018
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.14 x 0.71 x 9.21 inches
- Print length312 pages
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Routledge; 1st edition (February 5, 2018)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 312 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1138549134
- ISBN-13 : 978-1138549135
- Item Weight : 16 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 0.71 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #133,202 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #36 in Trade
- #147 in Christian Bible Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha
- #13,195 in Biographies (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Sean McDowell, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Apologetics at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University. He graduated summa cum laude from from Talbot Theological Seminary with a double master's degree in philosophy and theology. He earned his PH.D. in Apologetics and Worldview Studies from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is the author, co-author, or editor of over fifteen books including Evidence that Demands a Verdict, So the Next Generation Will Know, Ethix: Being Bold in a Whatever World, Understanding Intelligent Design, the Apologetics Study Bible for Students, Same-Sex Marriage: A Thoughtful Approach to God's Design for Marriage, and Is God Just a Human Invention?. Sean was named Educator of the Year for San Juan Capistrano in 2007-08. His apologetics training has received exemplary status from the Association of Christian Schools International. He is a regular guest on various radio and TV shows. You can read Sean's blog and contact him for speaking events at http://www.seanmcdowell.org. In April 2000, Sean married his high school sweetheart, Stephanie. They have three children, Scottie, Shauna, and Shane and live in San Juan Capistrano, California.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Overall, McDowell does a fantastic job of making things simple and providing clarity. The project he has taken on to look through each apostle seems to be an overwhelming task. To have brought all of this work together into a relatively short, but thorough book is astounding! His work adds to the cumulative case for the resurrection and allows Christians to objectively analyze the fate of the apostles. McDowell does a great job of defining terms and providing his methodology. He attempts to be as objective as possible and does a great job of evaluating sources. For example, even though it would help his case to agree with Cullman that 1 Clement provides evidence that Peter died in Rome, McDowell disagrees because the text does not make this claim. Additionally, McDowell agrees that the most straightforward way of interpreting the cup in Mark 10:35-45 refers to death even though John did not end up being martyred according to McDowell’s assessment. Thus, McDowell does his best to follow the evidence where it leads. Moreover, McDowell does a great job of putting forth an argument and addressing the counterarguments. He also does a good job of providing a variety of views and is extremely cautious as to the certainty of historical knowledge one can have on any particular issue. In other words, he is careful not to overstate his case.
One critique would be that McDowell relies heavily on the Gospels as valid sources. Even though he offers support for many passages, he does not go into great depth on this. However, this was outside the scope of the book so one should not fault him for this, but being an Evangelical Christian, one can see that he is more willing to treat the Gospels as accurate history than some other scholars. However, this does not impact his overall argument since he often shows that even if the writing is not wholly reliable or is pseudepigraphal, it still provides linkage to early tradition and thus critical evidence in evaluating the question at hand. Another critique that follows from McDowell’s reliability of Scripture would be that he places a large emphasis on Acts 5. His main foundation that the apostles were willing to suffer for their faith seems to come from Acts 5. Yet, Acts 5 does not say that “all twelve” of the apostles suffered in this episode. It simply mentions “the apostles.” One might argue that Acts 5 does not include all twelve apostles, but maybe only seven or eight of them. The text does not specify, thus one might argue that McDowell is placing too much emphasis on this passage.
Before diving in to each individual account, he spends a few chapters discussing the centrality of the resurrection in general and the twelve apostles—who they were, the internal and external witness of their missionary work, and their testimony. He then spends a chapter with a brief address of the cost of discipleship, persecution in the New Testament, martyrdom in the Old, and what persecution has looked like for Jews and Gentiles throughout history. McDowell then thoroughly assesses each of the 14 accounts before providing a summary and assigning to each a number from the scale previously mentioned. He concludes by addressing a few objections that are often made to the apostles’ martyrdoms before summarizing his investigation with six key points and a recap of the probabilities reached for each apostle analyzed.
While this book was assigned as one of three texts for a graduate level course on the resurrection, it is not overly academic for the lay person. In fact, though thoroughly researched, it reads more like a popular text such as McDowell’s other books or one by an author such as Lee Strobel or J. Warner Wallace.
I’m not sure I would have ever picked up this book without it being required reading. But I’m glad it was. For anyone who might be curious about the fate of the apostles, this work takes a deep dive into the arguments and evidence both for and against the martyrdom of each individual. Both biblical and extra-biblical sources were utilized in the research therein. McDowell didn’t seem to leave a single stone unturned when it came to his investigative work. He mentions texts that I had never heard of, but each has its place in providing supporting evidence for or against the likelihood of each martyrdom.
What I did not expect was how the impact of this investigation, and the details that were fleshed out in the process, added to the cumulative case for the resurrection of Jesus. Whether martyred or not, the willingness of each to suffer and die for their faith speaks volumes. Each of these men were in the presence of the risen Jesus—at least they each believed they had witnessed his appearance. Then each went on a mission to share the gospel with surrounding nations knowing that doing so would likely cause them great pains, perhaps even death. If the resurrection had not happened, had they made the whole thing up, then their willingness to suffer—and even die—would have been solely for what they knew to be a lie.
One popular objection to the idea of Christian martyrdom is that there have been many people of faith, whether Buddhist, Muslim, or those from random groups (the Heaven’s Gate Cult comes to mind), who have died for what they believed to be true. What this text uncovers is that these apostles didn’t just believe it, they lived it. And there is evidence to back up not only their existence, and in some cases their deaths, but there is evidence to show their willingness to suffer for what they experienced to be true. This goes a long way in providing the skeptic with reasons to at least consider why Christianity is not the same as every other religion. For the person who is a Christian, you will find treasures in this book that will bolster your faith in ways you didn’t know existed. I’m glad I was “forced” to make it part of my library.
Top reviews from other countries
Scholarly work exploring the lives of Jesus’ apostles abounds, but little of it seems to focus on evaluating the evidence for their martyrdom. Sean McDowell undertakes a tedious task of tracing and analyzing the reliability of a vast number of historical documents (including patristic and apocryphal sources), evaluating them according to a methodologically sophisticated system of epistemological soundness as well as a probabilistic categorization of their historicity according to nine criteria. He then proceeds to defining the term (apostolic) ‘martyrdom’ as “involving death for confession of the Christian faith”, as a precursor to the mass persecutions of Christians under Nero (AD 54-68).
McDowell is also aware of the challenges surrounding a proper historical investigation and the large variation of evidence for the different cases he pursues, although he is reluctant to dismiss the usability of a source that may contain legendary accounts, insisting rather on whether it contains a ‘historical core’. Furthermore, being aware of other historical challenges, such as the competition between cities claiming apostolic heritage, and the fact that in Graeco-Roman culture courageous death was considered a virtue, he seems reluctant to quickly dismiss such cases as irrelevant, putting an onus on critics, claiming that “the silence of history is telling”. The church did not need to invent all these martyrdom stories. The apostles willingly faced death as an act of imitating Christ.
McDowell insists that the resurrection was at the core of the church’s message (kerygma) since its inception. He investigates each of the 14 cases (the twelve apostles, including Matthias filling in for Judas Iscariot, plus Paul and Jesus’ brother James) as to them being eyewitnesses, a criterion that separates them from other Christian martyrs. Finally, he proceeds to a historical investigation of the martyrdom in each of the 14 cases and concludes with a summary of findings.
Six points emerge as an overall outcome: Firstly, that the Jesus movement was a movement shaped by the belief “he had risen from the grave, conquering death and sin”. Secondly, that the 12 apostles were the first witnesses of the resurrection. Paul and James were eyewitnesses of the resurrection, who were willing to suffer and die for their beliefs. Thirdly, that Jesus had predicted the persecution of his followers. Fourthly, in the cases where no early evidence exists that the apostles died as martyrs, some general claims make their individual martyrdoms “more likely than not”. Fifthly, that the apostles were threatened, beaten, thrown in prison, and killed for their faith, and yet they refused to back down because they obeyed God rather than men. Sixthly, that there are no accounts that any of the apostles recanted their faith which shows that they sincerely believed.
I profited a lot from reading this book.
Dr. Erastos Filos, Physicist, Brussels/Belgium
First, it should be noted that this is an academic text that provides a scholarly analysis of the historical evidence for the martyrdom of the Apostles, therefore the content can be heavy at times. However, though most academic texts can be challenging to follow and comprehend, there is a logical flow to this book that allows the reader to follow along quite easily from start to finish. Moreover, McDowell skillfully interacts with the content in a way that makes it is easy to comprehend for the reader which is a definite strength of the book.
Beginning in Chapter 1, McDowell clearly defines what martyrdom is and what it is not, keeping in mind the first-century understanding of what martyrdom meant. Additionally, McDowell provides a coherent outline of the methodology he uses for assessing the historical evidence and offers insight into the various challenges there are when conducting a historical investigation. Chapter 2 then establishes that the resurrection is and always has been, since the earliest records, the core message of Christianity since its inception. There is no Christianity without the resurrection. McDowell goes on in Chapter 3 to describe what is known about the apostles and determine the case that they were, in fact, eyewitnesses. This establishes a crucial distinction between the martyrdom of the Apostles and other martyrs throughout history, as the Apostles uniquely died for their belief that they witnessed, firsthand, the risen Christ. From here, in-depth historical evidence is provided and analyzed in terms of its certainty.
I really enjoyed Chapter 4 as McDowell reconstructs and examines the historical background that the Christians were undeniably persecuted, which makes it more plausible that the Apostles were actually martyred. This is an area where critics have had significant push back, claiming that the Christian persecution motif has been overstated. Conversely, McDowell reasons from the New Testament, early Christian writings, as well as from the works of Roman and Jewish historians, that persecution and even martyrdom was a central theme, even core doctrine, in the early Christian church.
Chapters 5-18 then are what McDowell considers to be the main substance of the book and the “linchpin” of the argument. Throughout these chapters McDowell provides a compelling case for the reality of the many of the Apostles martyrdom, and provides insight into the significance of their willingness to suffer and die for their convictions. After a meticulous analysis of the evidence, it can be concluded that the Apostles fearlessly and unapologetically went to theirs deaths proclaiming that they had indeed seen the risen Christ, many of them being brutally martyred for this belief. Moreover, there is not a shred of evidence that suggests that any one of them recanted their belief in the resurrection, even when faced with severe persecution, even death. McDowell makes it clear though that the sincerity of the Apostles’ conviction and their martyrdom does not prove that the resurrection is true. Nonetheless, the strength of their conviction that they had seen the risen Christ and their willingness to die for their conviction provides a compelling case for veracity of the resurrection.
McDowell then closes by addressing the common objections to the martyrdom of the Apostles and offers a short, yet solid rebuttal to each. Finally, he provides an insightful analysis of the data and draws the conclusion that one can put their confidence in the historical accounts that the Apostles sincerely believed that they had personally experienced the risen Christ, and were willing to suffer and die for their beliefs that Jesus was indeed the risen Messiah.
In conclusion, this book is nothing short of brilliant and it will prove to be an insightful and captivating read. With precision, lucidity, and a comprehensive grasp of the historical evidence available, McDowell undoubtedly provides a well-reasoned case for fate of the Apostles. For this reason I highly recommend this book and consider it a must read for anyone who is interested in the origins of the Christian faith.
After an introduction that included his responses to challenges of a historical investigation of the apostles’ deaths, McDowell continued to show that the belief in the resurrection of Jesus was the cornerstone of the early church and that it was not a later addition or invention. McDowell also provided evidence that Paul, James, and the twelve apostles were eyewitnesses to the resurrection. This is a crucial assertion because it demonstrates that they were not dying merely for a belief but for their eyewitness testimony. In other words, they were willing to die for the testimony that they indeed witnessed the resurrected Jesus. For the bulk of the book, McDowell evaluated the historical evidence related to each apostle and gave a rating to how probable, based on the evidence, the said apostle died a martyr.
Dr. Sean McDowell has adopted a systematic, objective, and historical approach to investigating the deaths of the apostles. Furthermore, he clearly explained why the martyrdom accounts of the apostles are important as part of the cumulative case for the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus, what the martyrdom accounts do not explain, and why a historical approach is relevant in his investigation. In addition, to limit biases of secondary sources, McDowell restricted his analysis to accounts from the living memory. He also gave each martyrdom account a rating of probability based on his evaluation of the evidence. These are admirable attempts to be as objective as possible in investigating the apostles’ deaths. His detailed explanation of each source of evidence and the reasons for his ratings are very helpful in helping me to follow his argument and understand the rationale behind each evaluation.